Why PlanSieve
Don’t buy a tool welded to one problem. Adopt an engine that speaks your business.
This page is the point of view. It names the pattern the category is built on, the pattern we refused, and the principles you can hold us to.
The thesis
The engine claim, and the product claim on top of it
The legacy planning suites fuse their engine to their schema. Item, location and customer are baked into the core, so every new question is a migration and every customer is a multi-year project. PlanSieve refuses that fusion: the data model, the math, the interface, the connectors and even the storage engine are all pluggable behind eight contracts. That is the engine claim.
The product claim sits on top of it. A planner gets a surface where every setting is a switch they own, every number explains itself, and a verdict takes one gesture. The complexity of a business goes in: its dimensions, its history, its drivers, its exceptions. And what comes out is a plan that can be asked why.
Complexity inClarity out
Two patterns
Engine fused to schema, or engine behind contracts
This is a contrast between two ways of building a planning platform, not between two products. The first pattern is the category’s. The second is ours.
Eight principles
The principles a buyer can hold us to
These are invariants, not aspirations. A design that violates one is wrong, not creative, and each one is proven on the platform page.
No hardcoded business concept
There is no item table, no location table, no customer table in the core. If a concept were hardcoded, we would call it a bug. Your vocabulary is the model.
Proven under Your vocabulary is the modelEverything configurable from the interface
If changing business behaviour needed a code edit or a config file, it would not be done. Formulas, rules, pages, sets, policies, actions: all screens, all versioned.
Proven under Everything is a policyAlgorithms are plug-ins
The built-ins use the same contract your proprietary model would. Nothing is privileged; everything is scored by the same backtest and recorded in the same lineage.
Proven under Open by designStorage is an adapter, not a vendor
One logical model, swappable storage, a columnar interchange in between, so the same product is honest on a laptop and on a billion rows.
Proven under The enginePlatform first: modules are configuration
The platform is done when its engines and contracts are complete; a module is a package of metadata. Demand ships on the same core that will carry the rest.
Proven under Open by designNothing is a black box
Every number is traceable to its inputs, its formula or model, its version, and who or what produced it, and the explanation is of the number you clicked, always.
Proven under Nothing is a black boxSecure and multi-tenant from row one
Isolation and permissions are in the first line of the schema. Retrofitting tenancy is a rewrite; we refused to earn that debt.
Proven under Secure from row oneTruthful by construction
Accuracy, bias and forecast value added are measured and surfaced automatically, including when a human override made the plan worse.
Proven under Nothing is a black box
What you will not find here
No logo wall. No uplift percentage. No badge.
A pre-customer product has one credibility asset, and it is not a claim. It is refusing to make the ones it cannot back.
- No customer proof. No logos, no testimonials, no case studies. None exist yet, and a fabricated one would cost more than it earned.
- No accuracy uplift. Forecast value added and accuracy are capabilities the platform surfaces, not results we have delivered to anyone. We will not quote a percentage we did not measure on your data.
- No certification. We describe the security posture, row-level isolation, audit, self-hosted observability with no external egress, and not a certificate we have not obtained.
- No timeline promise. The platform is designed so a new planning problem is configuration, not a rebuild. We say that, and only that, until we have proven more.
- Every number carries its framing. Measured in our lab, on our own test data, never a customer benchmark, never a cloud cluster. It says so beside the number. The full table, with caveats.
We write in the company’s voice. What is on this site is what the product does, and every claim names where it was measured.
Judge the engine on your data
Bring your history, your hierarchies and your vocabulary. We show the platform working on them, and where it does not, we say so.
a working demo on your data · no commitment